Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift › Leitartikel › Begutachtung

5 Zitate (Scopus)

Originalsprache	Englisch
Seiten (von - bis)	527-528
Seitenumfang	2
Fachzeitschrift	Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Jahrgang	43
Ausgabenummer	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/ggr.12303
Publikationsstatus	Veröffentlicht - 1 Dez. 2019

Zugriff auf Dokument

@article{4ae10491fc0f4984a4786f11b794f49c,

title = "Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations",

author = "Meisel, {Thomas C.}",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/ggr.12303",

language = "English",

volume = "43",

pages = "527--528",

journal = "Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research",

issn = "1639-4488",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why δ is not ‰ and why we should not use ε and μ notations

AU - Meisel, Thomas C.

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075200261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ggr.12303

DO - 10.1111/ggr.12303

M3 - Editorial

AN - SCOPUS:85075200261

SN - 1639-4488

VL - 43

SP - 527

EP - 528

JO - Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research

JF - Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research

IS - 4

ER -