TY - JOUR
T1 - Fabrication and properties of extrusion-based 3D-printed hardmetal and cermet components
AU - Lengauer, Walter
AU - Duretek, Ivica
AU - Fürst, Markus
AU - Schwarz, Viktoria
AU - Gonzalez-Gutierrez, Joamin
AU - Schuschnigg, Stephan
AU - Kukla, Christian
AU - Kitzmantel, Michael
AU - Neubauer, Erich
AU - Lieberwirth, Clemens
AU - Morrison, Vincent
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - Hardmetal and cermet bodies were printed by fused-filament fabrication (FFF) and composite-extrusion modelling (CEM) in an SDS (shaping – debinding – sintering) process. For FFF the filaments were prepared from hardmetal (WC-10Co) and cermet powder (Ti(C,N)-Co/Ni-based) and organic binder. The CEM feedstock consisted of WC-Co MIM powder. A 3D filament printer as well as a 3D printer working with a MIM granulate were employed to fabricate printed bodies by FFF and CEM, respectively. The solvent debinding process was performed in cyclohexane (FFF-printed bodies) or water (CEM-printed bodies). Thermal debinding of all parts was performed in a tube furnace up to a temperature of 800 °C. The pre-sintered parts were then subjected to vacuum sintering by application of conventional vacuum sintering profiles up to 1430 °C for hardmetals and up to 1480 °C for cermets. Dimensional and mass changes upon the various preparation steps as well as microstructure and porosity of the sintered bodies were investigated. While the microstructure is practically identical to that of conventionally prepared materials, some cavities were present from the printing process because of yet non-optimised printing strategy. By change of printing strategy the cavities could be minimised or even avoided. The study shows that with the applied 3D extrusion-printing techniques, hardmetal and cermet components with innovative geometries are accessible.
AB - Hardmetal and cermet bodies were printed by fused-filament fabrication (FFF) and composite-extrusion modelling (CEM) in an SDS (shaping – debinding – sintering) process. For FFF the filaments were prepared from hardmetal (WC-10Co) and cermet powder (Ti(C,N)-Co/Ni-based) and organic binder. The CEM feedstock consisted of WC-Co MIM powder. A 3D filament printer as well as a 3D printer working with a MIM granulate were employed to fabricate printed bodies by FFF and CEM, respectively. The solvent debinding process was performed in cyclohexane (FFF-printed bodies) or water (CEM-printed bodies). Thermal debinding of all parts was performed in a tube furnace up to a temperature of 800 °C. The pre-sintered parts were then subjected to vacuum sintering by application of conventional vacuum sintering profiles up to 1430 °C for hardmetals and up to 1480 °C for cermets. Dimensional and mass changes upon the various preparation steps as well as microstructure and porosity of the sintered bodies were investigated. While the microstructure is practically identical to that of conventionally prepared materials, some cavities were present from the printing process because of yet non-optimised printing strategy. By change of printing strategy the cavities could be minimised or even avoided. The study shows that with the applied 3D extrusion-printing techniques, hardmetal and cermet components with innovative geometries are accessible.
KW - Material Extrusion
KW - hardmetal
KW - cermet
KW - Additive Manufacturing
KW - Sintering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064398036&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.04.011
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2019.04.011
M3 - Article
SN - 0263-4368
VL - 82.2019
SP - 141
EP - 149
JO - International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials
JF - International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials
IS - August
ER -